RE: Re: SPEC-X
- Subject: RE: Re: SPEC-X
- From: E* H* <e*@mymts.net>
- Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2010 12:15:05 -0600
|
Kudos to Bob, for all the work he's done, both in the past and now. Still, he can't do it all alone. If he can hang in there, Dennis, so should you and the rest of us as well. I'm sure we've given Bob some good ideas too. As the old saying goes, "Rome wasn't built in a day". To: iris-species@yahoogroups.com From: dkramb@badbear.com Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2010 11:56:43 -0500 Subject: Re: [iris-species] Re: SPEC-X
Well that's the key word right there. "Awarded". Dolce is viewed differently by award-minded & non-award-minded people.
You asked why does it matter to us? Well that's easy. AIS is big a society devoted to promoting all irises (in theory). It's dominated by TB enthusiasts. SPEC and SPEC-X enthusiasts are a minority. So having this TB being touted as a SPEC-X is a little bit upsetting because it's taking attention away from other SPEC-X that I care about. I feel it's disrespectful to the likes of Little Caillet and Ally Oops to be competing for attention against TBs which aren't "TB" enough for TB-lovers. It makes me angry! I pay good money for my membership in AIS. Yet it promotes TBs at the expense of other irises that I'm actually interested in, so perhaps my money would be better spent elsewhere. Dennis in Cincinnati ('nuff said) On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 3:14 AM, David Ferguson <m*@msn.com> wrote:
|
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: award system
- From: &* H* &*
- Re: award system
- References:
- Re: Re: SPEC-X
- From: &* &*
- Re: Re: SPEC-X
- From: R* P* &*
- RE: Re: SPEC-X
- From: D* F* &*
- Re: Re: SPEC-X
- From: D* K* &*
- Re: Re: SPEC-X
- Prev by Date: RE: RE : Cotton Carnival (was Re: RE : [iris-species] garden merit)
- Next by Date: Re: REÂ: Cotton Carnival (was Re: RE : garden merit)
- Previous by thread: Re: Re: SPEC-X
- Next by thread: Re: award system