Re: award system
- Subject: Re: award system
- From: &* H* <h*@povn.com>
- Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2010 19:29:29 -0800
|
Just a casual observance here...
The awards system may inadvertently favor bearded cvs
simply because of time limitations.
Bearded irises have an advantage simply because most
people are familiar with the growing conditions needed for them. I
doubt that most people realize how long it may take some species and species-x
irises to settle into a new garden and perform at peak. It's quite often a
matter of the grower getting lucky enough to finally stumble upon the ideal
microclimate after a number of attempts and this can take years.
A case in point: 'Alley Oops' did well enough here in
the garden at large, managing to produce a few nice blooms each season with
slow but steady increase. When moved to a pot and given a permanent
place in the fish pond, has turned into a show stopper with the most aggressive
increase I've seen short of pseudacorus.
The other reason, and it's a huge one, Tall Bearded
irises may have the biggest advantage is that most commercial growers
find that the general public hasn't a clue that other irises even exist. It
takes a lot of effort to grow species and species-x irises as well as a
financial incentive. When bearded irises sell better, it only makes sense that
most gardens will favor them over other types.
I like the idea of a tierred method of judging. Those
people familiar with a species or type could single out cvs of merit who then
would hand off the judging to another group familiar with even more types until
an educated consensus is reached.
Christy Hensler
Newport, WA
16" of new snow today and still coming
down...
|
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: Re: award system
- From: E* H* &*
- Ideas about Judging
- From: C*
- Re: Re: award system
- From: C* C* &*
- RE: Re: award system
- References:
- Re: Re: SPEC-X
- From: &* &*
- Re: Re: SPEC-X
- From: R* P* &*
- RE: Re: SPEC-X
- From: D* F* &*
- Re: Re: SPEC-X
- From: D* K* &*
- RE: Re: SPEC-X
- From: E* H* &*
- Re: Re: SPEC-X
- Prev by Date: Re: bias?
- Next by Date: Re: Re: bias?
- Previous by thread: RE: Re: SPEC-X
- Next by thread: Re: Re: award system