RE: Re: SPEC-X
- Subject: RE: Re: SPEC-X
- From: E* H* <e*@mymts.net>
- Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 08:43:14 -0600
|
Forgive me for saying this was clever marketing for Paul, much like Ben Hager was clever at marketing his iris. To: iris-species@yahoogroups.com From: jamievande@freenet.de Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 15:20:00 +0100 Subject: Re: [iris-species] Re: SPEC-X
Dennis, now you're being silly! Such a hybrid can never compete in a TB class and the TB enthusiasts would simply comment, 'pretty for such a primitive thing!' and then turn to the next ruffled dinner plate and ooh and ahh. I understand you wanting a truly acknowledged primitve/species bred category, but we don't seem to have one in the AIS, or do you have special show categories in the States for such hybrids? The few shows I visit always disappoint me in the lack of acknowledgment less that 'current fashion' works receive. I think we are all in agreement, here, otherwise most of us wouldn't be SIGNA members. I would prefer to see truly groundbreaking work being shown and awarded, but I don't find pushing cultivars such as Dolce into no mans land appropriate. This is, also, not fair (but then, life is not fair, now, is it?) If we must have awards, I would prefer to see more sub-categories noted, defined and awarded. I tried this with Hemerocallis in Europe, but few gardeners/hybridizers seem to be interested. They prefer jumping onto the already rolling band wagon and btchn about the rules, instead of thinking outside of the envelope. This was a lesson to me; you can give a gardener fertilizer, but you can't make him spread it about or people don't mind change, as long as everything stay the same. (mixed metaphor?) Jamie PS: do stick to your definition, I don't want to sway you. It is important that such views are considered and someone carries their torch. |
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Re: SPEC-X
- From: &* &*
- Re: Re: SPEC-X
- References:
- RE: Re: SPEC-X
- From: &* A* Z* &*
- Re: SPEC-X
- From: C* C* &*
- Re: Re: SPEC-X
- From: D* K* &*
- Re: Re: SPEC-X
- From: &* &*
- RE: Re: SPEC-X
- Prev by Date: Re: Re: SPEC-X
- Next by Date: RE: Re: SPEC-X
- Previous by thread: Re: Re: SPEC-X
- Next by thread: Re: Re: SPEC-X