iris@hort.net
- Subject: Re: HYB: fall rebloom genetics
- From: B* W* <a*@aol.com>
- Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2011 12:21:18 -0400 (EDT)
<<I can provide you with some formulas that predict bloom based on warmth, mount of daylength etc, They are in the book "Manipulation of Flowering" dited by Atherton. But basically I'm not sure they add much to a good rediction.>> >>Weather webpages such as weather underground, can give you daylength nformation for various locals and dates.>> Thanks Chuck, I thought you might already have the information indexed. I'll put this on my list for winter work. For now, I already have more things to do than I have time to do them. Thanks for your input. Betty W. -----Original Message----- From: Chuck Chapman <irischapman@aim.com> To: iris <iris@hort.net> Sent: Sat, Apr 30, 2011 11:11 am Subject: Re: [iris] HYB: fall rebloom genetics Somehow I doubt if day length make much difference in timing of spring bloom. suspect more temperature and time to grow a bloom stalk from trigger emperature. And this will vary according to day temperatures. A factor could very well be the carry over of an immature flower stalk from all. One that started but climate conditions stopped growth, and flower talk not big enough to be bothered by lower temperatures. When you can get full bloom season in California in March, then the day ength that they get there that triggers flower stalks will be the critical aylength. The triggering will obviously be a couple of weeks before a TB ctually blooms. Of course SDB will need less time to go from trigger to flowering. So look at daylenght in early March for California, and then check when your aylength corresponds, and then check with your bloom data. I can provide you with some formulas that predict bloom based on warmth, mount of daylength etc, They are in the book "Manipulation of Flowering" dited by Atherton. But basically I'm not sure they add much to a good rediction. Weather webpages such as weather underground, can give you daylength nformation for various locals and dates. Chuck Chapman --- Original Message ---- rom: Betty Wilkerson <autmirislvr@aol.com> o: iris@hort.net ent: Sat, Apr 30, 2011 10:27 am ubject: Re: [iris] HYB: fall rebloom genetics < Make note of these as they should be the ones u use for "Summer rebloom" Has to do with going directly from bud set to owerstalk.>> Chuck, The "Summer Rebloomer" are ready to go as soon as the temperatures warm up. he early blooms were on my 'All Revved Up' (it can bloom from frost to rost) nd 'Lunar Whitewash' followed by 'Matrix.' Most seedlings showing hope for ummer bloom were in this group also. Fall cycle rebloomers depend on day length as a trigger. The later ones this pring) are primarily fall rebloomers or so I thought--'Again & Again,' Tara's Choice,' Theme Master,' 'Vanishing Act' etc.. In 2006 this group loomed before anything else. (typically do) 'Summer Radiance' has often been my first spring bloom, but this year it was ay behind the earlier ones. 'Star Gate' gave an early stalk, some middle talks, and there are two more that don't even show color yet. SG is ypically later than the rest with spring bloom. 'Over & Over' has been among my most dependable rebloomers, often blooming in he summer. It bloomed with the middle group. Renown was between ARU group nd the Tara's Choice group. About normal for Renown. Betty W. ----Original Message----- rom: Chuck Chapman <irischapman@aim.com> o: iris <iris@hort.net> ent: Sat, Apr 30, 2011 8:20 am ubject: Re: [iris] HYB: fall rebloom genetics Linda has also noted this at times. Most of these should be the summer bloomers or as I call them the direct rebloomers.. they respond to a mperature trigger. So most years are the first to bloom, but with differernt ather can sometimes be later. Make note of these as they should be the ones u use for "Summer rebloom" Has to do with going directly from bud set to owerstalk. huck Chapman -- Original Message ---- om: Betty Wilkerson <autmirislvr@aol.com> : iris@hort.net nt: Sat, Apr 30, 2011 7:30 am bject: [iris] HYB: fall rebloom genetics he iris season has been weird here. uring a typical spring season, most of the rebloomers begin in the first ek f iris season.) This year, some of the "early birds" did not begin ooming til the second week and even later. huck, is it possible that their bloom season is controlled by day length in e spring as well as in the fall? Thus they do not respond to an early ason in the same way as the rest? f not, is there another explanation? etty W. -------------------------------------------------------------------- sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the ssage text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS -------------------------------------------------------------------- sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the ssage text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS --------------------------------------------------------------------- o sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the essage text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS --------------------------------------------------------------------- o sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the essage text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS --------------------------------------------------------------------- To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS
- References:
- HYB: rebloom genetics
- From: L* M* &*
- HYB: fall rebloom genetics
- From: B* W* &*
- Re: HYB: fall rebloom genetics
- From: C* C* &*
- Re: HYB: fall rebloom genetics
- From: B* W* &*
- Re: HYB: fall rebloom genetics
- From: C* C* &*
- HYB: rebloom genetics
- Prev by Date: Re: HYB: fall rebloom genetics
- Previous by thread: Re: HYB: fall rebloom genetics
- Next by thread: Re: HYB: fall rebloom genetics