Re: Re: Re: Anthocyanin-sidetracked
- Subject: Re: Re: Re: Anthocyanin-sidetracked
- From: c* f* <f*@yahoo.com>
- Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 13:44:21 -0700 (PDT)
- List-archive: <http://www.hort.net/lists/iris/> (Web Archive)
Paul,
I saw that, and remember it... but I have filed amoena, and plicata thoughts under "not the tail I think I'm chasing."
----- Original Message ----
From: Paul Archer <pharcher@mindspring.com>
To: iris@hort.net
Sent: Tuesday, August 5, 2008 2:14:28 PM
Subject: Re: [iris] Re: Re: Anthocyanin-sidetracked
I'm sure this doesn't help either but I had mentioned a while back of getting plicatas from I. suaveolens when crossed with Swertii.
Paul Archer
Currently moved to Indianapolis, IN Zone 5
(was Raleigh, NC Zone 8)
>And to further muddle things up for you, I've got what should be glaciata seedlings in a second generation from KUPARI (a glaciata white Iris pallida) crossed with Iris suaveolens. I say "should be" because suaveolens has contributed some pale anthocyanin pigmentation that is showing up only in the falls. When I had first discussed this with Neil, years ago, when we were only seeing the first generation, we talked of it as a "dominant amoena" gene - like I(s), but now that I've been working with it for a little longer. I'm starting to think of it differently. I'll see if I can find a picture and repost it to Iris-Photos. So you can see what I mean.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |
Thread Index