Re: OT: AIS orders
- To: Multiple recipients of list <i*@rt66.com>
- Subject: Re: OT: AIS orders
- From: "* L* C* <c*@pipeline.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Aug 1997 19:03:42 -0600 (MDT)
At 11:30 AM 8/27/97 -0600, you wrote:
>> BTW, they again stated that they were told my Mr. Gifford that he WAS
>> CAUGHT UP (obviously not the truth) when they picked up the materials.
>> Nancy Pocklington said to remind anyone that hasn't received their
>> material to contact them, otherwise they have NO RECORD of who is
>> waiting for what. Gifford gave them NO records and no checks.
>> Pocklington's address/phone can be found in latest AIS Bulletin.
>
>What happened to this man, that he could behave in such a manner? I can
>understand guilt, shame, depression entering in and if in deep enough
>needing to be bailed out, but ...
>--
>Amy Moseley Rupp
>amyr@austx.tandem.com, Austin, TX, USDA zone 8b, Sunset zone 30
>Jill O. *Trades, Mistress O. {} busy bee as proponent for:
>ftp://www.isc.org/pub/usenet/news.announce.newgroups/misc/misc.kids.moderated
Folks: I was really riled about this situation, but I think the
Pocklingtons are not only trying to straighten it out but probably are
really doing it.
What do we gain, now that he's out of it, by trashing poor Gifford, who
volunteered to do a job that was too much for him and didn't bail out fast
enough? If anyone is to blame, it is the IRS board who were aware of the
problem for a considerable time before they took action. But, whoah! They
had to replace a volunteer with another volunteer. Volunteers really don't
grow on trees, or in iris beds. Not too many of us stepped forward and
offered our basements.
I would like to see more posts thanking the Pocklingtons for taking it over
and doing it, and fewer beating a dead horse. It's OK to be annoyed, but
let's not hold a grudge.
>
Edmund L. Castillo in Loudoun Co., VA
castillo@pipeline.com
