Re: AIS: REF: AIS as International Registration Authority
- Subject: Re: [iris] AIS: REF: AIS as International Registration Authority
- From: C*@aol.com
- Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 10:08:23 EST
- List-archive: <http://www.hort.net/lists/iris/> (Web Archive)
In a message dated 12/8/04 8:42:14 AM Eastern Standard Time,
rpries@sbcglobal.net writes:
<< Any professional archivist will tell you the longest lasting records are
printed matter on acid proof paper. >>
GIGLEE prints from digital images of the original plant might be useful to
consider for some documentation applications.Of course, you will have the same
problem with any picture that you have with real herbarium specimens, to wit:
Big plants at natural size make big images, and so big printing problems and
big storage issues, and reduction of the image beyond a certain point may defeat
the entire purpose of the excercise.
Since issues of image durability are being discussed I think these questions,
unsporting as they may be, should be asked: How long do you think these
images will actually be needed? Are you attempting to document every registered
Iris cultivar into perpetuity? Practically speaking, how long do you anticipate
most of these cultivars will remain in commerce? In mainstream gardens? In the
crosshairs of Iris scholars?
Cordially,
Anner Whitehead
Richmond VA USA
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |
Thread Index