Re: Re: AIS: secret decoder ring...
- Subject: Re: [iris-talk] Re: AIS: secret decoder ring...
- From: l*
- Date: Sun, 10 Feb 02 13:54:22 -0600
>when I was still editing, I was including
>introduction information with the registration entry. For example, if I
>was editing pages from the 80s checklist where an introduction wasn't
>given, & Mike Lowe sent out updated information from the 90s checklist
>for the name of the nursery that introduced it, I added that to the main
>entry.
Seriously??? When I edit pages, I never add any info not present on the
pages I'm editing. No one ever told me I should! Of course, I didn't
jump in on the project until the '79 CL was being digitally prepared, and
I've also edited some '69 pages. Am I supposed to be searching out intro
dates for cvs registered in one CL and introed in the next?
>I've forgotten if the year in the
>entry is the year of registration or introduction or if it's supposed to
>be both.
In the 59-99 CLs, the year of registration follows the name of the
hybridizer in the parenthesis following the cultivar name. The year of
intro (if given) follows the name of the introducer (if given) at the end
of the entry.
Laurie
-----------------
laurief@paulbunyan.net
http://www.geocities.com/lfandjg/
zone 3b northern MN - clay soil
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
