Re: CULT: Leaf Removal & Soft Rot
- Subject: Re: [iris] CULT: Leaf Removal & Soft Rot
- From: O*@aol.com
- Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 23:59:59 EST
- List-archive: <http://www.hort.net/lists/iris/> (Web Archive)
In a message dated 2/3/2003 12:18:21 PM Central Standard Time,
jbruce1@cinci.rr.com writes:
> This is interesting, but some factor must be missing, either
> in my data or in the university study.
>
> The soil pH at my nursery is 5.0 down to 4.3 in spots.
> Iris flourish there, as does Erwinia. Soft rot with that distinctive smell
> at any rate. Is there another bacteria that causes soft rot that
> makes that same smell? When I say flourish, I mean grow very well,
> increase and bloom. Our pH measurements have been done twice
> by sending samples to Ohio State University Ag Extension for analysis
> as well as out own pH meter. Could the pH requirement you cite
> be dependant on soil content and type?
>
> Always wondering about stuff.
>
We have great commonality with the wonderin'. Too, I'm mostly parroting
information gleaned from other sources in this instance though experience
here tends to support the pH information. Its pretty common to find
differences between laboratory data and the circumstances we actually
encounter under field conditions. I usually chalk the differences up to the
uncontrolled variables encountered in the field.
You probably already know that soil pH is a moving, ever changing target and
is finite only at a given point in time. Each time anything is added with a
different pH it changes the soils pH, e.g., water, fertilizer, compost. Each
time anything is taken away it also changes, e.g., leeching, water or soil
nutrients used by the plant or by ongoing composting of organic matter in the
soil. Pretty much just routine chemical reactions are going on in the soil
all the time. Ultimately, native soil will revert back to it's original
native pH level unless some action is taken. It is also reasonable to expect
rather wide variations in the pH levels of the individual samplings that
constitute the final soil sample that one might collect for analysis.
Measuring devices that indicate pH (meters and paper) do much here to
alleviate persistent wonderin'. Interestingly, pH levels often vary
significantly in the immediate area of live root mass filaments from that of
the surrounding native soil. Given the opening of this paragraph this is not
unexpected.
Cooley's I believe suggests a neutral to slightly higher pH. Sutton has
stated they are growing in about 7.1. Other posters to this list have grown
in higher pH levels. I suspect many, like yourself are growing in much lower
pH levels. Here, I've made some effort (though far from controlled research)
to grow/evaluate growth rates at different pH levels and observe propensity
for rot to occur in those same beds. Maximum (18x) increase of any plant here
was achieved by Keppel's Local Color. It was grown in a soil pH that varied
between 7.8 and 8.1. I have however, observed rot in this particular bed. I
also let rot run its course as it was encountered. I have yet to totally lose
any of the 30 different plants growing in it. An adjacent bed containing a
different 25 plants growing in pH levels between 6.5 and 7.2 has had some
total losses. Higher pH beds (pH 10 and up) have never been observed as
having any rot. I would like to say this was planned. It wasn't. Just
observed. The high pH levels resulted from using burn piles to raise soil
nutrient levels with higher pH being the result.
I do not know if another bacteria produces the characteristic smell of
Erwinia c. I do not personally think God is mean so maybe not. But, He does
have a sense of humor and there are other Erwinia stains. Erwinia c. is
present in soils world wide.
I would think it both possible and probable that soil content and type can be
contributing factors-considering that we are measuring average pH not the pH
of individual soil particles. Indeed, we might even view each individual soil
particle as its own little micro world either neutral, hostile of comforting
to Erwinia c. I have mentally speculated that nitrogen application/soft rot
correlation reported by iris people are actually nitrogen application/pH
micro world changes/soft rot correlation.
Those missing factors? Maybe moisture levels, temperature and/or ultraviolet
light saturation?
Smiles and wonderin' (mental speculation to those without an interpreter),
Bill Burleson 7a/b
Old South Iris Society
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS