Re: CULT:CAT: evaluation of iris sources criteria?
- Subject: Re: [iris] CULT:CAT: evaluation of iris sources criteria?
- From: O*@aol.com
- Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 10:15:15 EST
- List-archive: <http://www.hort.net/lists/iris/> (Web Archive)
In a message dated 2/23/2003 7:43:06 AM Central Standard Time,
twinhill@earthlink.net writes:
> I have no desire to add to my collection of
> NOIDS (...no I.D.s)
Excellent word Janet.
I will be dividing the "NOIDS" into two subcategories in the future:
The ADENOIDS: will be the one I was pleased to receive and could ultimately
identiy and
The ANNOYEDS: that will include the ones I wasn't.
I may ultimately add a third catagory the ANODES to designate the ones that
were positively attractive regardless of subcatagory.
Smiles,
Bill Burleson 7
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS
