Re: AIS: Bulletins, Changes, Membership

You are absolutely right. I neglected to address the page count issue.

There is also another interesting twist, that is: If you reduce the page count enough we could possibly change from perfect binding to a much cheaper alternative.

No, I am not advocating reducing the page count significantly. What is important is to make what we publish better and more interesting by having more iris related articles.

John

On Feb 13, 2006, at 7:05 AM, ChatOWhitehall@aol.com wrote:

In a message dated 2/12/2006 2:54:27 PM Eastern Standard Time,
jijones@usjoneses.com writes:

I don't know whether all the above applies nor how much, but I am
saying it is not necessarily cheaper. It still may be better.


How can it be cheaper if you do not also reduce the length of the Bulletin
itself?

If the idea is to free up more pages in the Bulletin for "interesting
articles," then are we not talking about leaving the length of the Bulletin more or
less the same, while moving some content to a second printed publication?
How is this cheaper?

Did I miss something?

Cordially,

Anner Whitehead
Richmond VA USA

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS



John                | "There be dragons here"
                         |  Annotation used by ancient cartographers
                         |  to indicate the edge of the known world.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index