iris@hort.net
- Subject: RE: Re: HYB: another terminology question
- From: C* C* <i*@aim.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 13:50:54 -0500 (EST)
This cross I can believe. Basically a shading difference between amounts of anthrocyanin in the two crosses. Could easily be a result of a cellular ph difference controlled by extra-nuclear genes. Amethyst Winter , is an amethyst violet, and Purple Piroquette is a deep purple.
Not the presence of one pigment (eg lycopene) in one cross and completely absent in the other. A factor controlled by nuclear genes.
Chuck Chapman -----Original Message----- From: Francelle Edwards <fjmjedwards@q.com> To: iris <iris@hort.net> Sent: Wed, Feb 27, 2013 1:37 pm Subject: RE: [iris] Re: HYB: another terminology questionI've had experiences like that also, Betty. I didn't keep good records ten years ago. My thinking was; why keep records on anything not good enough to keep. I made a memorable recprical cross between Amethyst Winter and Purple
Pirouette and planted them side by side in two twenty foot rows. Thedifferences between them were striking. One was mostly copies of Amethyst Winter. The other consisted of blue and purple blends with a lot of brown on the hafts. I thought they were ugly. I can understand though that there
was no carotine in either. Francelle -----Original Message-----From: owner-iris@hort.net [o*@hort.net] On Behalf Of Betty
Wilkerson Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2013 1:34 PM To: iris@hort.net Subject: Re: [iris] Re: HYB: another terminology question The first year I was making crosses I did a cross between Peach Spot andHighland Chief and also did the reverse. 'Peach Spot' is a white iris with a peach spot on the fall. Highland Chief is a beautiful red on yellow/cream
plicata from Gibson. Approximately, 30 each way. All 25+ of the PS X HC were approximately 18 inches tall with four big blooms. (Big Bertha even bloomed on fall.) They all looked alike. They could have been clones from the same rhizome. But, they weren't. They were siblings. The ones with 'Highland Chief' as pod parent produced a wide variety ofseedlings, all tall and multi branched, some with triple teminals. A couple were peach selfs. One was a bright orange self. Several had white falls with yellow standards and fall rings. It was one of the most educational
and intriguing crosses I've ever made.They definitely did not look like siblings. There were no characteristics in common. The one batch was VERY ugly, while the others were all goreous.
How come if they are siblings? Betty Wilkerson Zone 6 KY autmirislvr@aol.com -----Original Message----- From: Chuck Chapman <irischapman@aim.com> To: iris <iris@hort.net> Sent: Sat, Feb 23, 2013 10:56 am Subject: Re: [iris] Re: HYB: another terminology questionFor sibling cross, it wouldn't make any difference when cross was made or
which parent was pod or which pollen.Why pod and pollen parent wouldn't matter is because the genes controlling major factors of colour andpattern are not located in plastids or mitochondria. As to getting plant
characteristics it would play a role. They are both sibs. So a sib cross to pull out or evaluate recessives will still work.But the reverse cross do have different genetics in terms of extra-nuclear genes, but are siblings.Chuck Chapman-----Original Message-----From:Betty Wilkerson <autmirislvr@aol.com>To: iris <iris@hort.net>Sent: Sat, Feb
23, 2013 11:13 amSubject: Re: [iris] Re: HYB: another terminology questionSiblings are any seedlings that come from the same cross.Example:'Treasured' X 'Renown'. Treasured is the pod parent and Renown is thepollen parent.A reverse cross would be 'Renown' X 'Treasure'. It is not
the same.Technically . . . if Linda made the same cross five years latertheywould be siblings. They are still the same cross.Each seedlings in a
pod is different, even if it can not be seen withthe naked eye. So, thefact that the seedlings in Linda's cross wouldlook different than the ones in my cross would be expected, even thoughthey would still (most) look like
siblings.Does this help?Betty WilkersonZone 6 KYautmirislvr@aol.com-----Original Message-----From: Shaub Dunkley <miscaccts@bellsouth.net>To: iris <iris@hort.net>Sent: Fri, Feb 22, 2013 5:21 pmSubject: [iris] Re: HYB: another terminologyquestionHey group -Hope this formats correctly - was unclear about how to
postto the list. I've lurked for some time on a learning curve. Long curveto go but gotta stumble in somewhere.It would seem being able todistinguish between pod sibling and sibling separated by time has valueworth conserving. Fraternal twins have less chance of beingstep-sibling. Across time, particularly across years, there ismorechance that records might have got mixed up, or field labels got mixedup
and Daddy Joe then is not Daddy Joe now, etc. (same for Mom). Mightnot a discriminating (subsequent) hybridizer want to utilize siblingknown to be from within the same pod if he wanted to critically improvechances of breeding within a certain gene pool?I'm still figuring outto sleuth cross information in the registry but it is apparent somehybridizers use numbering systems that are fairly transparent as to whoare pod sibling and who are across-time sibling. Gold stars to them.BTW- are there better terms than pod siblings and across-timesiblings?Shaub DunkleyAsheville, North Carolina Z6b-----OriginalMessage----- From: Tom Waters <irises@telp.com> To: iris<iris@hort.net> Sent: Fri, Feb 22, 2013 9:11 am Subject: [iris] HYB:another terminology questionWhile we're at it, I'm interested in howpeople understand the term "sibling". I've seen it sometimesapparentlyrestricted to two irises that came from the same pod of seed, or atleast the product of the cross of two plants made by the samehybridizer in
the same year. It seems to me that since the two parentsare clones, any irises with the same parentage are siblings, even ifthe crosses thatproduced them were made many years or miles apart bydifferent people. My own
brother and sisters, for example, are no lessmy brother and sisters forhaving been gestated separately at differenttimes. ;) Tom Waters Telperion
Oasis ~ www.telp.com/irises Cuyamungue,New Mexico, USA (zone 6) ----------------------------------------From:"Tom Waters" <irises@telp.com>Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 7:22AMTo:---------------------------------------------------------------------To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net withthemessage
text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS---------------------------------------------------------------------To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with themessage text
UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS---------------------------------------------------------------------To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with themessage text
UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS --------------------------------------------------------------------- To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS --------------------------------------------------------------------- To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS --------------------------------------------------------------------- To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS
- References:
- RE: Re: HYB: another terminology question
- From: &* E* &*
- RE: Re: HYB: another terminology question
- Prev by Date: Re: Re: HYB: spots (was another terminology question)
- Next by Date: RE: HYB: Sibling crosses was trying to learn some genetics terminology
- Previous by thread: RE: Re: HYB: another terminology question
- Next by thread: Re: Re: HYB: another terminology question