iris@hort.net
- Subject: Re: Re: HYB: theoretical never (was spots (was another terminology question)
- From: L* M* <l*@lock-net.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 05:38:49 -0500
;-)I'll try to remember that this is what is meant by 'never', i.e., theoretically impossible, based on current theories.
I wish our understanding of rebloom - both genotypic and phenotypic - was farther past the theoretical stage, but I guess I'd better not complain too much, if I'm not willing/able to collect the detailed data on temperature, soil conditions (water, pH, nutrients, fluffiness) to help sort it out.
On 2/27/2013 4:00 PM, Chuck Chapman wrote:
Of course having said that, there is always something very strange happening with mother nature. But if this happened, it wouldn't be a very low probability event, it would be a theoretically impossible event.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS
- References:
- Re: Re: HYB: spots (was another terminology question)
- From: L* M* &*
- Re: Re: HYB: spots (was another terminology question)
- From: C* C* &*
- Re: Re: HYB: spots (was another terminology question)
- Prev by Date: RE: HYB: Sibling crosses was trying to learn some genetics terminology
- Next by Date: Re: HYB: Sibling crosses was trying to learn some genetics terminology
- Previous by thread: Re: Re: HYB: spots (was another terminology question)
- Next by thread: Re: Re: HYB: spots (was another terminology question)