Re: cultivars and disease


In a message dated 96-02-15 19:29:13 EST, you write:

>
>I hope we won't be too quick to label cultivars as disease prone.  I don't
>doubt that there's a genetic component to most diseases, but many other
>variables are involved in the actual contracting of the disease.  Nutrition,
>watering, soil, garden location and luck are all possible contributors.  I
>have found that irises in a certain part of my garden may have more
disease--
>a fact that seems to rule out genetics as a factor.  
>
>

I hope I'm not being accused of this!  But I think it's valuable information
that some hybridizer's plants do better in certain climates... and that
others do not!  I think that the iris world loses many people to frustration
and disappointment when they plant something that does not grow well in their
particular climate.

That's why I tell new people that 1.  The best place to buy an iris is at
your local iris sale and 2)  we give all new members to our club 3 free
irises to get them going - we know the iris will grow here and it gives them
a good start with quality material.

I would NEVER accuse of hybridizer's efforts of being 'disease prone'.  But I
don't think there's anything wrong with making statement about what will and
will not grow in Buffalo, NY.

Kathy Guest - in the Buffalo 'burbs


Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index