Re: Iris ID : Permanent
- To: Multiple recipients of list <i*@rt66.com>
- Subject: Re: Iris ID : Permanent
- From: J*@aol.com
- Date: Tue, 10 Feb 1998 08:07:24 -0700 (MST)
In a message dated 98-02-09 23:19:08 EST, you write:
<< I keep having this wild fantasy. What if the AIS were to require that all
new iris introductions had at least part of both parent's names. . . The
possibilities boggle the imagination.
Ross >>
Hello all,
I've been learning tons from this list. And reading with as much absorption as
possible, all the technical writings. The above statement is close to what I
was thinking about last week. My idea was prompted from a show that I saw on
a channel on Cable TV, called 'Animal Planet'. This particular show was based
in Australia. It was about a lost dog, and trying to be concise here, the vet
waved this *gadget* over the dog, and lo and behold the dog was permanently
ID'd with a computer chip that was inserted under the skin of the dog.
How does this pertain to Iris ID? Well, ( gimme room, I'm going to go way out
here...) is it possible to know the exact variety of an Iris from a basis of a
chromosome count, or some other genetic type angle? I went further into this
thought thinking that if there was a way, then maybe when an Iris was
introduced, it also would be required to have had the appropriate *test* done,
which would be the permanent ID. Then there would be no more fear of lost
tags. Is this feasible?
Karen Ernst