Re: SPEC: Signa seed list--iris/irid cross
- To: iris-talk@onelist.com
- Subject: Re: [iris-talk] SPEC: Signa seed list--iris/irid cross
- From: H*@aol.com
- Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2000 13:09:02 EST
From: HIPSource@aol.com
In a message dated 1/3/00 11:41:48 AM Eastern Standard Time,
jcwalters@bridgernet.com writes:
<< Although my transcription of the text from the Judges' Handbook is
accurate, i.e., the word "iris" is not capitalized, my interpretation of
the intent of the language is that at least one parent of a species cross
must be a member of the Genus Iris in the botanical sense while the other
parent need not be. I think this interpretation of the word "iris" is
consistent with its use throughout the Judges' Handbook. >>
Well, I think in the context of an AIS publication the Genus should be
assumed, but in my not-very-learned opinion that language is not adequately
precise, and one would support greater precision on that substantial point
since it speaks to the essence of the question at hand.
Anner Whitehead
HIPSource@aol.com
--------------------------- ONElist Sponsor ----------------------------
GRAB THE GATOR! FREE SOFTWARE DOES ALL THE TYPING FOR YOU!
Tired of filling out forms and remembering passwords? Gator fills in
forms and passwords with just one click! Comes with $50 in free coupons!
<a href=" http://clickme.onelist.com/ad/gator4 ">Click Here</a>
------------------------------------------------------------------------