Re: AIS: "Illegitimate Irises"
- To: "Dell Perry" , iris-talk@onelist.com
- Subject: Re: [iris-talk] AIS: "Illegitimate Irises"
- From: w*
- Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2000 16:02:21 -0600
- Priority: normal
From: "wmoores" <wmoores@watervalley.net>
> From: "Dell Perry" <Dellp@gwmail.plano.gov>
>
> If an iris only has to be 'registered' as the quote says, and DRADY was
> registered in 1999, then there should be no problem - it goes in with the
> non-seedling/species entries. Is the quote incomplete, and the cultivar
> must be registered AND introduced?
>
> What I quoted is complete for our purposes in this discussion. For the last several years in a row, I have won the best seedling
with named but not introduced varieties....LEMON CHESS, VIOLET SHIMMER, CHOCOLATE CHESS are
all in this category of named but not introduced when they won their
EC's.
The question of DRADY and FLIGHT OF BUTTERFLIES has been asked
before. I have heard that these two, because of their age and
distribution, should go with the regular classes in a show. Is this
written down somewhere?
Walter Moores
Enid Lake, MS 7/8
--------------------------- ONElist Sponsor ----------------------------
Save 50 percent at MotherNature.com. See site for details
<a href=" http://clickme.onelist.com/ad/MotherNature ">Click Here</a>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
