Re: HIST: Weeds n' Wimps
- Subject: Re: [iris] HIST: Weeds n' Wimps
- From: "Sergey Loktev" s*@mtu-net.ru
- Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 23:12:43 +0300
- List-archive: <http://www.hort.net/lists/iris/> (Web Archive)
I use the following time categories for myself, concerning iris varieties:
- newest - not older than 10 years;
- new - 11-20 years;
- of middle age - 21-40 years;
- old - 41-60 years;
- ancient - older than 60 years.
They certainly are not connected with the flower form.
Sergey Loktev
----- Original Message -----
From: <DFerguson@cabq.gov>
To: <iris@hort.net>
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 9:36 PM
Subject: Re: [iris] HIST: Weeds n' Wimps
............................................................................
.............................
>
> As time goes by, the 30 year or older definition of "historic" has moved
> deep into the time frame when irises don't look historic any more. I
> wonder if another category could be set up for Irises older than say 1945
> or so. Perhaps it could be called "Heirloom" (a popular term lately) or
> perhaps "Ancestral", or how about "Pre-historic" (chuckles go here)?
>
> Dave
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
> message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS