Re: CHANGE OF PACE and HIGH STANDARDS
- To: Multiple recipients of list <i*@rt66.com>
- Subject: Re: CHANGE OF PACE and HIGH STANDARDS
- From: C*@aol.com
- Date: Tue, 7 Jan 1997 15:30:46 -0700 (MST)
In a message dated 97-01-07 12:24:22 EST, you write:
<< Stockton's 1996 catalog they write, of Change of Pace:
"Makes our list of five that we would want on a 'desert island' -- not
that irises would be able to grow on a desert island." (Well, maybe
arils?)
Barb Johnson ljohnson@cland.net >>
I do appreciate your comment Barb, and also those of others who have praised
CHANGE OF PACE...I sometimes wonder whether I have learned anything at all
about what constitutes a good iris, considering how the official ballots turn
out sometimes. In the Oct. Bulletin are the Award of Merit winners for
1996---and CHANGE OF PACE ended up as a runner up. Didn't made it. Of the
irises that did made it, I have seen all of them in different gardens except
BUSY BEING BLUE (somehow, dispite visiting many gardens every year I never
remember seeing that one even once!)
Of the irises that did make the AM in 1996, very few come close to the
consistent performance of CHANGE OF PACE. I grow half of them and none
performs as well as CHANGE OF PACE.
Among the Siberians, I find it amazing....absolutely amazing.....that
CORONATION ANTHEM got 11 more votes for the Morgan-Wood than HIGH STANDARDS.
I have grown both of these irises since they were introduced and CORONATION
ANTHEM can't even approach HIGH STANDARDS as a garden iris. HIGH STANDARDS
is fabulous, approaching perfection. Clarence Mahan in VA