Re: CAT: Quality (was Another Order IN!!)
- Subject: Re: [iris-talk] CAT: Quality (was Another Order IN!!)
- From: S* O*
- Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 19:10:06 -0700 (PDT)
--- Catherine Button
<cathy@pav.research.panasonic.com> wrote:
> It is hard for me to remember every detail, but many
> of the fat, plump, iris
> rhizomes I have occassionally received did worse for
> me than the average size
> guys.
I agree with you there. I don't really appreciate
those giant overfed rhizomes that are bigger than my
head. I find that often, they rot before winter sets
in. But some of the rhizomes I have received in the
past were no bigger than my finger to the first
knuckle. No exageration. That is way too small to be
considered "blooming size".
> I have never
> received a misnamed iris from Aitken and I have had
> some large orders. Most
> of them I would say are average size, not big, but
> always very healthy looking.
Cool, thanks for you input. It always helps to hear
what others have experienced in the past.
Sterling (not Innerst)
Seattle, WA. USA
zone 8
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Autos - Get free new car price quotes
http://autos.yahoo.com
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Save on REALTOR Fees
http://us.click.yahoo.com/Xw80LD/h1ZEAA/Ey.GAA/2gGylB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
