Re: TB: Bud Count (was ANOMOLY?)
- To: Multiple recipients of list <i*@rt66.com>
- Subject: Re: TB: Bud Count (was ANOMOLY?)
- From: r* <t*@catskill.net>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jun 1997 07:20:06 -0600 (MDT)
Jeff and Carolyn Walters wrote:
>
> Hi Rima!
> You write (10 June 97):
> >
> > Now the anomaly, if indeed it is such. On my VSOIs (very superior old
> > irises), the pale yellow un-named TBs I keep talking about, there are a
> > profusion of bloomstalks and many buds. About five stalks are now in
> > bloom. The bloomstalks range from 19 to 32" and the tallest has five
> > buds on one stalk. The others that are as tall have four on each and
> > the smaller ones have three. I've never seen five buds on an iris TB
> > bloomstalk, or any other for that matter. these irises were the ones
> > that were divided yet bloomed profusely the very next spring (which was
> > last spring). This year they are even better. Are they really very
> > superior or are five buds to a stalk not unusual?
>
> We are taught in Judges' Training that 7 buds is the minimum desirable
> number in a modern TB. Quite a few cultivars have 8 or 9 buds per stalk and
> some have 11, or rarely, even more. I wonder if you were referring to
> individual buds in your posting, or perhaps to branches, which may be
> multi-budded? This is how the bud counts that I am referring to are
> achieved on stalks with a terminal, spur, and two or three branches, which
> is typical in the newer cultivars.
>
> Jeff Walters in northern Utah (USDA Zone 4, Sunset Zone 2)
> cwalters@cache.net
Hi Jeff--
I'm not sure I know the difference, so I will go out and take a good
look when I get back from work today. It seems like the more I know,
the less I know.
Rima terra@catskill.net
upstate NY zone 4