AB: To be or not to be Lady Mohr
- Subject: AB: To be or not to be Lady Mohr
- From: l*
- Date: Mon, 11 Mar 02 11:20:17 -0600
>> Laurie: I would say with 99 44/100% certainty that your unknown arilbred is
>> Lady Mohr registered and intro'd by Salbach in 1943. There are others in
>> your collection that are extremely familiar but I would not want to stick my
>> neck out that far without more data. <g>.
>>
>> Dave Silverberg
>
>Sorry Dave, but I DON'T think it's LADY MOHR. Its the right general color
>pattern, within normal variation due to growing conditions, and even the
>extra dotting could be explained away by sun exposure -- but the Lady's form
>tends to be less rounded, the beard more dense and less diffuse, and all my
>photos show the "eyelashes" as pale violet rather than green.
My, my, how quickly the names come and go around here. ;-)
>But, no -- I'm won't hazard a guess as to what it really is.
Oh come on, Sharon. PPPLLLEEEAASSSEEE??? I promise I won't hold you to
it. If it helps at all, I'm quite certain this bloom gave off the
distinct scent of cinnamon, regardless of the insistence of everyone else
who smelled her that she emitted eau de dog doo.
Laurie
-----------------
laurief@paulbunyan.net
http://www.geocities.com/lfandjg/
zone 3b northern MN - clay soil
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
