Re: TB: Louisa's Song


John,

I really do agree that the current system does give the appearance 
of "insider" control.  I've been growing Irises for many years, but 
only recently have I thrown myself into serious study.  This aspect 
is what I find least appealing about Iris competition on a national 
level. 

From someone so recently from the outside looking in, there seems to 
be a great deal of politics involved in the selection of the winners.

I showed Arabians for many years and really grew to dislike the 
artificial nature of that group's national politics.  Certainly 
whenever money is at stake, the potential always exists.

I think I'll end up sticking with buying the iris I like, and not 
worrying so much about what awards it has.

Robin
NE Zone 4/5





  --- In iris-talk@y..., John Reeds <jreeds@m...> wrote:
> > American Iris Society. If it were the World Iris Society, or 
International
> > Iris Society, one would expect it to fill that criterion.  It 
holds the
> > registration book, so must be recognised by all other societies. 
I am sure
> > there are many iris growers in Aus or Britain who never have 
anything to
> > do with the AIS. America is not the universe, nor even the centre 
of it.
> > From my perspective, the Aus Dykes award is quite visible.
> > How many of Graeme grosveners irises have any of you seen?
> > How may of you have seen Alan Johnsons LA's?
> > the Italian Forenze seems to be the most 'international' 
competition.
> > 
> > Cheers, Jan in Aus, not touting superiority of the Aus system, 
nor taking 
> > offence at Johns comments ... just trying to bring a different
> > perspective.
> > 
> Actually, Jan, I mostly agree with you.  It's not that I think the 
American
> Iris Society should rule the world, I just think it should 
recognize foreign
> intros.  Certainly Australia has a number of notable hybridizers, 
but I
> still think someone from Iceland, Yugoslavia, Iran, Antarctica, 
Somalia, or
> Tibet should be able to introduce an iris in his own country and 
still
> receive international recognition.  Escpecially if they don't even 
have
> local awards.  Maybe we need an international iris society?  I just 
don't
> like the exclusivity of reserving top awards for insiders.  If we 
recognized
> foreign-bred iris, we might be more exposed to them.  Interesting 
how many
> top louisiana hybridizers are Australian; where was Louisiana again?
> 
> I guess part of my attitude comes from living in Californa, which is
> probably as international as any place in the world.  I believe in 
the
> "melting pot" philosophy, not in that we all become alike but as in 
a rich
> stew (Louisiana Gumbo?) we all have so much to offer to the 
wondrously
> complex blend.  I am disgusted with politicians 
perverting "diversity" into
> a means of isolating ethnic groups, convincing them that they are 
being
> treated unfairly, and pretending to represent their "special" 
interests.
> This may not translate well to the iris scene, but I've always been 
an "open
> arms" kinda' guy.
> 
> John Reeds, surrounded by incipient bloom in sunny southern 
California  
> 
> 
> 
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
> > http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to 
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 
> > 
> >


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
FIND OLD SCHOOL FRIENDS and OLD FLAMES
Click here to start your search at Reunion.com today!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/NFsLKA/Dn2DAA/ySSFAA/2gGylB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index