Re: RE:HYB: Pallida
- Subject: Re: [iris] RE:HYB: Pallida
- From: D*@cabq.gov
- Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 14:02:01 -0700
- List-archive: <http://www.hort.net/lists/iris/> (Web Archive)
Hi Bill,
I was pointing out that I had seen, among cultivars of mixed I. pallida -
I. variegata ancestry, several with distorted standards and/or falls,
tending toward being flatties. If this is one of the factors that
evidences hybrid ancestry for 'Edina', and against pure I. pallida
ancestry, then having a similar flattie that is I. pallida sort of weakens
the evidence. Doesn't prove anything one way or the other though.
Dave
Oneofcultivars@ao
l.com To: iris@hort.net
. Sent by: cc:
owner-iris@hort.n Subject: Re: [iris] RE:HYB: Pallida
et
03/08/05 11:09 AM
Please respond to
iris
In a message dated 3/8/2005 10:17:41 AM Central Standard Time,
DFerguson@cabq.gov writes:
> Of course, anyone paying attention will notice a chink in the flattie
> argument.
I called myself paying attention and visited each link provided but
sometimes
miss salient points. Kindly elaborate of the chink in the argument beyond
not
knowing of a flattie variegata exists if you have more to offer.
Smiles,
Bill Burleson
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS
- Prev by Date: Re: RE:HYB: Pallida
- Next by Date: Re: RE:HYB: Pallida
- Previous by thread: Re: RE:HYB: Pallida
- Next by thread: Re: RE:HYB: Pallida