AR: Classification
- To: Multiple recipients of list <i*@rt66.com>
- Subject: AR: Classification
- From: S* M* <7*@CompuServe.COM>
- Date: Wed, 26 Mar 1997 13:02:14 -0700 (MST)
Tom Tadfor Little wrote:
: aril people tend to classify arilbreds
: by the number of aril chromosomes they carry, and whether that aril
: inheritance is onco, regelia, or mixed. They ignore whether the bearded
: ancestry is tall, median, or dwarf, but make fine distinctions regarding
: the aril ancestry (that's what all the OGB+, OB-, RB kind of stuff is
: about). This is a classification model that is useful to hybridizers, but
: doesn't say much regarding the appearance of the plant and flower.
: Introducing a horticultural classification (like that used for the bearded
: irises) into the arilbred world thus requires a major cultural change.
RARELY do I disagree with Tom -- but this time I have to say that I don't
consider the current classification system of much use to hybridizers, either.
: I have advocated such a classification model, but the suggestion has not
: yet received much attention from the Aril Society, and I don't really
: expect it to.
Nor did my own earlier efforts to promote a simpler system. I suspect we'll
just have to live with it a while longer.
Sharon McAllister
73372.1745@compuserve.com
I may have gotten off the subject a bit, but I hope my response was of
interest.