Re: CULT:HYB:More on those 450 rotters
- Subject: Re: CULT:HYB:More on those 450 rotters
- From: n*@charter.net
- Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 16:11:11 -0000
--- In iris-talk@y..., "Iris Moose" <irismoose@d...> wrote:
"When I spoke with people in real life "face-to-face" then it was
revealed the situation is dire, rot is rampant, hybridizers and
sellers don't care, it's all about money and getting the prettiest
plants to the market before they are even evaluated for garden
worthiness, and the iris in general are in decline."
I think this is coming down rather hard on some very conscientious
people. The process of testing, evaluating and preparing a variety
for introduction (let alone the process of selecting breeding stock)
DOES include disease resistance, hardiness, etc. A miffy variety
that rots easily is NOT a commercial variety--first of all because
the sellers can't grow it themselves.
But the conditions in my garden, and my cultural practices are not
the same as yours. I doubt there is ANY variety that is going to
perform perfectly everywhere. Hopefully the awards system (if judges
do their work with the kind of attention they must) rewards the
varieties with the BROADEST survivability and cultural durability.
(As an aside--This is one of the reasons I find the criticism of
EDITH WOLFORD so puzzling. How did this one ever get a Dykes if it is
so dratted difficult in so many areas?)
Normally, an AM or Dykes Medal would mean this variety is one that
can be relied upon to GROW most places.
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/