Re: TB: CULT: Cutting Spent Stalks
- Subject: Re: [iris] TB: CULT: Cutting Spent Stalks
- From: C*@aol.com
- Date: Mon, 2 May 2005 11:36:22 EDT
- List-archive: <http://www.hort.net/lists/iris/> (Web Archive)
In a message dated 5/2/05 9:50:35 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
koekkoek@mtcnet.net writes:
<<I've read repeatedly on this list that it is better to snap than to cut the
spent stalks. While I won't quarrel with those who say that, I want to say
that I have always cut, never snapped, those stalks, and I have never had a
case of rot develop from the thousands of cuts. I find cutting much faster,
and, besides, the stalks don't always want to snap. Too frustrating.>>
As I recall, the idea of snapping being better was first put forth here by
Bill Shear.
I've very loose soil so snapping has never been a viable option for me. The
most important thing, I personally believe, is to remove stalks cleanly, and
not damage the rhizome. I personally use a single edge razor blade, but that is
probably not a viable tool for someone dealing with a lot of irises. Leaving
stalks to wither is simply not a viable option here, either from the standpoint
of garden hygiene, or aesthetics.
In bloom here today, white tectorum and white cristata. Buds up on this and
that in the bearded bed. The pansies planted along the edge have been a lot of
fun.
Anner Whitehead
Richmond VA USA USDA Zone 7: Urban
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |
Thread Index