Re: RE:HYB:Oranges
- To: i*@egroups.com
- Subject: Re: [iris-talk] RE:HYB:Oranges
- From: a*@cs.com
- Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2000 10:26:20 EST
In a message dated 11/23/00 6:38:52 AM Mountain Standard Time, Chuck Chapman
writes:
<< the tangerine
factor appears to be partially recessive (speculation)rather then completely
recessive. This means that it continues to influence the colour of the
yellow.
I say this as I have been pulling pink out of yellow by carefully looking at
the plant (in light of pedigree) and speculating on its genetics. This has
proven to work for me. Thus a yellow that has 3 tangerine genes will still be
yellow, the shade of yellow will be distinctly (sometimes subtally) different
from a yellow with no tangerine genes. >>
As it worked for many others before you, dating back to Orville Fay!
I have long been fascinated by the various mechanisms proposed to explain how
the t-factor actually works. Unfortunately, although I've read everything I
can get my hands on and corresponded with some knowledgeable hybridizers, I
have not been able to grow enough of this type to develop the fabled "eye".
In hopes that your observations hold the key:
One of the older theories was that the t-factor acted as a switch, directing
carotene production to either beta-carotene or lycopene. Because
beta-carotene is such an intense pigment, it must be eliminated for the pink
to show through -- so that four doses of the t-factor are required to get
pink and the trait appears to be recessive. IF this is the case, seedlings
with 3 doses of the t-factor should be YELLOW-ORANGE with just enough pink to
set them apart from those without the t-factor.
A newer theory proposed a more complex explanation: a "switch" that directed
the conversion of neurosporene to either the gamma/beta-carotene pathway or
the lycopene/alpha-carotene pathway, plus an inhibitor that then blocked the
conversion of lycopene to alpha-carotene. IF this is the case, those with 3
doses of the t-factor should be YELLOW with just a hint of pink that sets
them apart from those without the t-factor.
It sounds as if your observations support the newer theory -- but I don't
want to jump to conclusions. PLEASE elaborate a bit on the subtle
differences you see.
Sharon McAllister
-------------------------- eGroups Sponsor -------------------------~-~>
eLerts
It's Easy. It's Fun. Best of All, it's Free!
http://click.egroups.com/1/9699/0/_/486170/_/974993190/
---------------------------------------------------------------------_->