Re: REF: amoena vs neglecta & bitone vs bicolor
- Subject: Re: REF: amoena vs neglecta & bitone vs bicolor
- From: &* G* C* <j*@cox.net>
- Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 15:11:27 -0500
- List-archive: <http://www.hort.net/lists/iris/> (Web Archive)
Both Lindas' understandings are correct, and Jeff has explained this very well. Even so, in recent years, there has been a tendency by some to apply the term
"amoena" to irises whose standards are, in fact, not white, but very lightversions of the color of the falls. One rather extreme example is BEST BET, even though its hybridizer described the standards as "light wisteria blue". These are really
bitones, and I hope that the tendency to call them amoenas will be curtailed. Another perhaps more difficult question is posed by flowers whose standards are white, but flushed with color at the base, and whose falls are colored, though not necessarily the same color as the flush at the base of the standards. I think these might legitimately be called amoenas because the standards are, in fact, white, though with a partial infusion ofcolor, even if the flush extends fairly high up the standards. Any other thoughts on that? Remembering, of course, that "amoena", other than historically being applied to a particular color pattern in irises, does not in itself denote any color or pattern, but simply means "pleasant", so we, as irisarians, can determine how the term is to be used. -- Griff
----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeffrey Walters" <jeffwiris@yahoo.com>
To: <iris@hort.net> Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2007 7:15 PM Subject: Re: [iris] REF: amoena vs neglecta & bitone vs bicolor
Linda S. When the terms "Amoena" and "Neglecta" were first coined they referred to two specific bearded irises, one with white standards and violet/purple falls, and the other with light violet standards and deeper violet falls, respectively. Subsequently, any iris with either of these color patterns was referred to as an amoena or a neglecta. As Linda Mann indicated, as more color patterns began to occur in irises, 'amoena' came to refer to an iris with white standards and falls of any other solid color. To my knowledge 'neglecta' still refers to a blue/violet bitone. A third early designation for a color pattern was "Variegata". Originally this was the a species name applied to a bearded iris with yellow standards and red/brown falls (I. variegata). As with neglecta, variegata later became a generic term for the same color pattern in any bearded iris. As hybridizers continued to develop new color patterns in irises, terms such as reverse amoena, reverse neglecta, amoena-plicata, and variegata-plicata have come into use. Perhaps more than you wanted to know?! Jeff Walters in upstate South Carolina USDA Zone 7b --- Linda Smith <irisgrower@cableone.net> wrote:Linda M. Neglecta- I agree I thought it was bitone also, but if I'm reading the definition correctly that is in the AIS booklet on p. 8 it says they are bicolor. Most Other books say bitone. I do not at the moment have time to check other sources except what's in my house w catalogs etc. and some web pages. Most of them so far say bitone also. Amoena I'm pretty clear on. Anyway, discussion was great at meeting and I think it helped the new comers realize that there's lots to learn and it is fun. And even when we think we know something, there's always room for further investigation even on simple things. Thanks for replying so quickly. Linda in CW AZ -------Original Message------- From: Linda Mann Date: 11/09/07 16:54:18 To: iris@hort.net Subject: [iris] REF: amoena vs neglecta & bitone vs bicolor I <think> an amoena is white standards and some other color of falls, sometimes with a white rim around the falls, sometimes not. Back in the old days, amoenas were white over blue-purple, but now I <think> people call white over any other color an amoena. I always thought neglecta was bitone, and generally two shades of blue-purple, or red, not bicolor. I thought bicolor meant two different colors, not just two shades of one color. yes? I think it is a typo? -- Linda Mann east Tennessee USA zone 7/8 East Tennessee Iris Society <http://www.DiscoverET.org/etis> Region 7, Kentucky-Tennessee <http://www.aisregion7.org> American Iris Society web site <http://www.irises.org> talk archives: <http://www.hort.net/lists/iris-talk/> photos archives: <http://www.hort.net/lists/iris-photos/> online R&I <http://www.irisregister.com>---------------------------------------------------------------------To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS---------------------------------------------------------------------To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRISTired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: REF: amoena vs neglecta & bitone vs bicolor
- From: J* W* &*
- Re: REF: amoena vs neglecta & bitone vs bicolor
- References:
- Re: REF: amoena vs neglecta & bitone vs bicolor
- From: J* W* &*
- Re: REF: amoena vs neglecta & bitone vs bicolor
- Prev by Date: Re: REF: amoena vs neglecta & bitone vs bicolor
- Next by Date: Re: REF: amoena vs neglecta & bitone vs bicolor
- Previous by thread: Re: REF: amoena vs neglecta & bitone vs bicolor
- Next by thread: Re: REF: amoena vs neglecta & bitone vs bicolor