Re: AIS: 'Bored' and the Print Index


From: "wmoores" <wmoores@watervalley.net>


-----Original Message-----


>From: Irisborer@aol.com

>Well Walter, maybe I'm more excited than you are.  But if you read what
Ruth
>and I wrote, you'd know that this is the first step to getting all the R &
I
>information into a searchable database.  This is an important first step...
>slow because of copyrights and approval requirements... but let's look at
our
>glass as half-full.   We are progressing toward the dream of an electronic
>database - and at warp speed, as compared to activity up till now.
>
        I am as excited about the database as you are and will be one of the
first to access it whenever it becomes available.

>The index will, of course, be in electronic form... but having it on disk
>really wouldn't save much because the value of this index will be two-fold:
>
        Mention was made of fifty copies.  I understood it to be in print
form; now you say the index is in electronic format.  Are you talking about
an electronic index at some distant time?  This is confusing.

>
>After all... imagine how cranky you folks would get if we did a half-cocked
>job

        I don't think any of us are cranky...just trying to find out where
we stand with the electronic database.

        Walter Moores
        Enid Lake, MS 7/8


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help support ONElist, while generating interest in your product or
service. ONElist has a variety of advertising packages. Visit
http://www.onelist.com/advert.html for more information.



Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index