Re: HYB:AIS:Checklist
- Subject: Re: [iris-talk] HYB:AIS:Checklist
- From: o*@aol.com
- Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 15:09:49 EDT
In a message dated 10/10/2002 10:29:49 AM Central Daylight Time, RYFigge
writes:
> SO, I prefer and have and use the R & I all the time and I don't understand
> how anyone can do without it! I'm too busy to spend all that time to look
> things up on the monster, besides, you can't take it out in the garden,
> stick it in a bucket until you really need some info, etc.
I to have R&I indexes and use them for exactly the same purpose as you in the
same way. Except I may use mine a bit more attempting identification of
irises I should have mapped. Me being a little more of a procrastinator than
others.
My support for printed version in enthusiastic and not qualified in any way.
I could not do without it. It must always exist.
Just as the paperless office never materialized with the advent of computers
(in fact more is generated) so will the printed R&I endure and grow. The
improvements came in the ability to manage, coordinate and control business
with the computers use. More jobs were generated than lost (labor's fear).
For us that office is the garden and we are the labor. We choose how
efficient we want to be.
There is nothing to fear. The printed R&I is as least as safe as the Bible
itself among literate iris people. Only management's/power's preoccupation
with an erroneously perceived need to protect it requires change.
Lacking any power except brain and some of that,
Bill Burleson 7a/b
Old South Iris Society
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Sell a Home with Ease!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/SrPZMC/kTmEAA/MVfIAA/2gGylB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
