Re: Re: classifying as a Rebloomer
iris@hort.net
  • Subject: Re: Re: classifying as a Rebloomer
  • From: B* W* <1*@rewrite.hort.net>
  • Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2014 12:26:32 -0400

All rebloomers seem to work as recessives in my garden.  Don't see any
parenting as dominants.  


Betty Wilkerson
Zone 6 KY
autmirislvr@aol.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Chuck Chapman <db4f61431@rewrite.hort.net>
To: iris <iris@hort.net>
Sent: Sun, Oct 5, 2014 1:10 pm
Subject: Re: [iris]
Re: classifying as a Rebloomer


They are a recessive. Or a combination of
genes. Don't pass on summer 
rebloom  when crossed to something that doesn't
have summer rebloom in 
background.

Chuck Chapman

-----Original Message-----
From: Betty Wilkerson <101n@rewrite.hort.net>
To: iris <iris@hort.net>
Sent:
Sun, Oct 5, 2014 1:50 pm
Subject: Re: [iris] Re: classifying as a Rebloomer
Please elaborate.




<<Different story for  Summer Rebloom genes.>>
Betty
Wilkerson
Zone 6 KY
autmirislvr@aol.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To
sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
message text
UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS



Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index