PHOTO: Blue Iris (long article)
- To: i*@onelist.com
- Subject: PHOTO: Blue Iris (long article)
- From: "* O* <s*@hotmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 31 Oct 1998 19:12:47 PST
From: "Sterling Okase" <sterling_o@hotmail.com>
Hi Talkers,
For those of you who asked for it, here it is.
THE PHOTOGRAPHER AND THE BLUE IRIS
Ron Thoman, Delaware
It is disappointing that modern color films cannot faithfully
reproduce the blue color in iris. If the fleeting moments of the bloom
season are to be adequately captured on film, it is important that the
colors be realistic. Thankfully, there are filters available that will
correct for the blue deficiency of color film. By judging from the many
cameras dangling from the necks of iris enthusiasts on garden tours,
this solution to a nagging problem will be of wide interest.
I can recall on of the first Delaware Valley Iris Society meetings
I attended. The evenings activities progressed to the major feature, a
slide show. Midway through the presentation, Opal Brown's SEASIDE was
projected on the screen, but as a light rosy-lavender iris. This clashed
with any recollection of that lovely flax-blue bloom. Oh, I know that we
don't, as yet have a true spectrum blue iris as is sometimes portrayed
in iris catalogs. Still, how can we recreate the iris-blue hue on film?
Trying to answer that question has been my search for the last several
years.
Although great progress has been made in color films, color
rendition remains a compromise with certain colors favored over others.
For example, flesh-tones are in the driver's seat. White and grays also
have high priority. Comonplace colors such as that of the sky and grass
are also important. But the blue iris must take a back-seat to these
colors as far as the general public is concerned.
One Kodak publication states that the heavenly-blue morning glory
and ageratum flowers are examples of color occurring in nature that
reproduce poorly because color films are more sensitive than the eye to
the far red of the spectrum. The blue iris must also fall into that same
category.
During the 1976 bloom season, I conducted an experiment taking
photographs of the light blue BABBLING BROOK using different filter
combinations. I used High Speed Ektachrome film in a single lens reflex
camera. The results are summarized below:
Filter Evaluation
None too red
82A improvement over no filter
80C improvement over no filter
80B improvement over no filter
CC20C fourth best
CC30C third best
CC20C+82A best
CC20C+80C too blue
CC20C+80B too blue
CC50C second best
The evaluation is mine, but should provide a starting point for the
interested photographer. Four filter combinations provide satisfactory
correction; however, I consider the combinations of the two filters
CC20C and 82A to provide the best results. Although the CC20C filter is
the major factor, the 82A filter seems to add the right amount of blue.
The CC20C is a color compensating filter that subtracts a portion of the
red. The result is pleasing and realistic.
The 82A filter, the more common of the two, is normally bought as a
glass mounted filter. This is probably more practical to buy the CC20C
filter as a gelatin film. Gelatin filter frames, holders and adapters
are also available. A major photographic store will be able to help you
in the selection for your camera.
Iris Maniac,
Sterling (not Innerst)
Seattle, WA. Zone 8
AIS, KCIS, HIPS and MIS
And Friday Night Chat-o-phile
sterling_o@hotmail.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, or to change your subscription
to digest, go to the ONElist web site, at http://www.onelist.com and
select the User Center link from the menu bar on the left.