Re: RE: REB:Reports (everbloomers ?)
- Subject: Re: [iris] RE: REB:Reports (everbloomers ?)
- From: l* <l*@paulbunyan.net>
- Date: Sat, 4 Sep 04 11:47:19 -0600
- List-archive: <http://www.hort.net/lists/iris/> (Web Archive)
>the rebloomers 'seem' to be the worst performing
>of the bearded irises up here in the mountains.
That's really interesting, Ellen, because among the TBs, rebloomers tend
to do MUCH better than oncers for me. Not that they rebloom here, mind
you (not even IMMORTALITY - not once!), but they do tend to be much more
vigorous, much more capable of outgrowing rot infections, and much more
likely to bloom reliably in the spring. Only some older historic TBs can
match their performance in my garden. Of course, the dwarfs and medians
(exclusive of BBs) typically exceed the reliability of any TBs here by a
mile.
Laurie
-----------------
laurief@paulbunyan.net
http://www.geocities.com/lfandjg/
http://www.angelfire.com/mn3/shadowood/irisintro.html
USDA zone 3b, AHS zone 4 - northern MN
normal annual precipitation 26-27"
slightly acid clay soil
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE IRIS
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |
Thread Index