Re: subject lines
Tom Tadfor Little wrote:
>
> Carolyn and all: This is not a matter of personal preference; it is a
> list policy. Whether one person's screw-ups help "build character" in
> those of us who have to put up with them is beside the point.
>
> Honest mistakes by folks who are new and still learning, or who just
> occasionally forget, are to be expected. But deliberate disregard for
> others is just plain irresponsible.
>
> Everyone should review and respect the published policies of this
> list. They are designed to make it a smooth and worthwhile experience
> for everyone.
>
I don't think anyone has "deliberate disregard" for the list, the policies associated
with it, or for anyone participating on it. For some it may be lack of understanding,
for others the mail environment may be difficult. "Irresponsible" is a harsh word and, I
think, uncalled for. We all need to be courteous, and that includes staying with iris
subject matter, and trying to keep subject lines relevent. I'm not perfect, I can't
expect others to be, AND I try to do the best I can. I enjoy the list, find it valuable.
With 210 subscribers now, "OUR" list is getting busy.
--
Thanks | "There be dragons here"
John | Annotation used by ancient cartographers
| to indicate the edge of the known world.
John Jones, jijones@ix.netcom.com
Fremont CA, USDA zone 8 (coastal, bay)
510.795.9723
