Re: Re[2]:Marah fabaceus
- Subject: Re: Re[2]:Marah fabaceus
- From: B* G*
- Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 20:58:27 -0700
Deborah.Lindsay@kaiseral.com writes:
>Yes.These were irrigated gardens.
Well, there you go :). I read a web page (the one that mentioned water
seems to be the limiting factor) saying that in one such irrigated garden
it was rampant and covered everything it was allowed to touch.
I think if grown in a garden, to keep it under control, one would need to
keep it either in a dry section of the garden, or limit the water it gets
to keep growth in check. At least these dont turn woody and strangle trees
(well, if watered constantly it could shade out a tree i guess)