Dull or Delightful?
- Subject: Dull or Delightful?
- From: "Tim Longville" t*@BTinternet.com
- Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2002 13:37:30 -0000
|
Interesting range of opinions re Kangaroo Paw
flowers - from the 'dull'/'hardly worth growing' from Glenn and myself to
David's 'delightful' 8ft ever-lastings!
I'd have marked this difference down to
dreaded 'climate' once again, if it weren't for where Glenn is. So is it,
rather, that there are certain KPs which are 'dull' (some of the small-flowered
spp?) but others which are 'delightful' (some larger-flowered - and
more tender? - spp? some cultivars??)?
If so, 'names and packdrills' of the superior
versions, please - the packdrills to include if possible the degree(s) of
hardiness to winter cold (and more particularly wet) and the degrees of summer
heat needed to promote maximum growth/flowering.
Tim-on-the-Solway
where cistus and ceanothus still bloom
and hellebores and primulas are already out:
seasons? what they?
(next week will no doubt provide the
answer[s])
|
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Dull or Delightful?
- From: d* f*
- From: d* f*
- Re: Dull or Delightful?
- Prev by Date: Re: Hardy 'pretty' flowers/Kangaroo Paw?
- Next by Date: Re: Hardy 'pretty' flowers/Kangaroo Paw?
- Previous by thread: Hardy 'pretty' flowers/Kangaroo Paw?
- Next by thread: Re: Dull or Delightful?