Re: up market
- Subject: Re: up market
- From: G*@aol.com
- Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 11:35:55 EST
|
On 4th Jan Anthony wrote: "I have learnt the hard way that the more glossy
and upmarket the journal, the fewer the sales that will result, - the readers
don't like getting muck up their finger nails".
As a reader of some glossies as well as any other source of
gardening lore [including this one !] I think this is a bit mean, and nothing to
do with muck up fingernails. [Does he mean that readers of the"downmarket"
mags have dirty fingernails?] Could it be that we are not so easily
swayed by what journalists tell us . Perhaps we have a "Master Plan", or ideas
of our own, or read some of the respected writers of gardening books and spend
time reflecting etc etc ? Maybe all our spare cash has gone on same
glossies and there is none left for spontaneous plant buying. [That's not very
convincing is it ?]
Nonetheless well done for the rant. Good stuff. Happy New Year.
Jennifer.
|
- Follow-Ups:
- Prev by Date: RE: good plants
- Next by Date: RE: Californian Gardens
- Previous by thread: Tipped Fremontodendron
- Next by thread: Convolvulus arvensis and cardboard / newspaper