Re: Brachychiton acerifolius
- Subject: Re: Brachychiton acerifolius
- From: T* R*
- Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 00:44:37 +1000
|
More on the subject from
Sydney:
B. acerifolius extends up the east coast
of Australia from about 100 miles S of Sydney to maybe 200 miles N of Brisbane,
then in more interrupted occurrences well into the tropics. As far as I know
it's confined to true rainforest as we use the term in Australia, i.e. forest of
continuous canopy, many tree species (except at highest altitudes and
latitudes), no eucalypts, and lianes and epiphytes abundant. At the southern end
of this range rainfall is not strongly seasonal, though has a modest peak in
early autumn, and is mostly 40-60 in/yr where such rainforests occur. Going
north toward the tropics rainfall becomes much more summer-dominant and the dry
season is quite severe, but I think B. acerifolius sticks to the wetter patches
on the coastal escarpment that catch moist ocean air -- other
Brachychiton spp. take its place in more monsoonal areas, e.g. B. discolor, B.
australis, B. rupestris, and members of the B. paradoxus group when you get to
the far north.
There is a gap in the distribution of B.
acerifolius from about 50 miles north of Sydney to about 50 miles south, which
seems to correspond with the infertile sandstone and shale soils of the Sydney
region. Further south it occurs mainly on basalt soils. Distributions of Ficus
macrophylla and the palm Archontophoenix cunninghamiana show a similar
gap.
Interesting about this species doing well
in San Diego with 20 in rainfall -- the same goes for Ficus macrophylla, doesn't
it? and that grows in much the same rainforests here as B. acerifolius. Can they
thrive without any irrigation?
In NSW it's one of our very few deciduous
rainforest trees though unlike our famous Red Cedar (Toona ciliata), which is
leafless in winter, it is leafless through spring and a little into
summer. But it can be erratic and some trees do not lose their leaves, or
lose them only on part of the canopy. As an ornamental in Sydney it's
renowned for the unreliability of its flowering. This generally correlates
strongly with leaflessness, and often you will only get flowers on the leafless
part of a tree's canopy. From about the 1930s to the 50s there was a fad for
mixing them with jacarandas in streets and parks here as the flowering seasons
usually overlap and people loved the color combination, but in the end they
found the Brachychiton could not be relied on (jacarandas are very reliable and
are spectacular in Sydney). Incidentally, there are hybrids occasionally grown
here, of B. acerifolius x B. populneus and B. acerifolius x B. discolor, but
they are not nearly as showy and often flower very poorly.
|
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Brachychiton acerifolius
- From: N* S*
- From: N* S*
- Re: Jacaranda looks good with red (Was Brachychiton acerifolius
- From: T* a* M* R*
- From: T* a* M* R*
- Re: Brachychiton acerifolius
- From: J* D*
- From: J* D*
- Re: Ficus macrophylla
- From: J* D*
- From: J* D*
- Re: Brachychiton acerifolius
- References:
- Brachychiton acerifolius
- From: N* S*
- From: N* S*
- Re: Brachychiton acerifolius
- From: "T* R*"
- From: "T* R*"
- Re: Brachychiton acerifolius
- From: R*
- Brachychiton acerifolius
- Prev by Date: Re: Brachychiton acerifolius
- Next by Date: Re: Sydney/Southern Calif/SF Bay Area Climate Comparisons
- Previous by thread: Re: Brachychiton acerifolius
- Next by thread: Re: Ficus macrophylla