Melaleucas



>Susan - re melaleuca, from a pom point of view, I think they are wonderful.
>   Took several photos when I was last in Oz, I thought the shapes and
>colours of them were wonderful -  loved the bark - and it seemed they were
>fragrant?   Had thoughts about a bush style garden if I was lucky enough to
>live there.
>


Yes - I agree - the bark and the branch shapes are some of the most 
interesting things about them.

When I see the contorted shapes of some species I am reminded of the 
photographs that Gertrude Jekyll took of odd shaped trees in the woods near 
her home - I always think it is a bit of a shame that this kind of 
quirkiness is not always appreciated.

My view is that the pervasive culture which seems to make a virtue of being 
'neat and tidy' is at least partially the cause - we even have a "Tidy Town" 
competition in Australia!!! Needless to say natural environments seem to 
score low and nineteenth century style rigid municipal bedding schemes seem 
to score hands down - where is William Robinson's spirit when you need him! 
(my husband and I call those that seem to suffer from this malady the 
'Neatness Police'). The sufferers around my area have a bit of a job coping 
with my garden - I'm a big fan of Mirabel Osler's 'A gentle plea for chaos' 
and garden accordingly!

(How was that for a soap box effort - I'm just feeling a bit sensitive 
because the local council has just cut down three 80 year old banksias at 
the end of my street because they want to neaten and widen the road!!!)

PS - there is a great book on the Myrtaceae called "Bottlebrushes, 
Paperbarks and Tea Trees" by John Wrigley and Murray Fagg

Susan George
McCrae Victoria Australia

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com



Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index