This is a public-interest archive. Personal data is pseudonymized and retained under
GDPR Article 89.
Re: Callistemon ( I think) question
- To: m*@ucdavis.edu
- Subject: Re: Callistemon ( I think) question
- From: J* A* <j*@tiny.mech.eng.usyd.edu.au>
- Date: Wed, 17 Sep 1997 17:12:40 +1000
At 01:34 AM 9/17/97 -0400, Ken Osborn wrote:
>Then someone suggested it was perhaps a Callistemon called `Little
>John', an Australian native and cultivar. The Australian National
>Botanic Garden, Callistemon page
>(http://www.anbg.gov.au.callistemon/callistemon.html), lists
>Callistemon citrinus as `Crimson Bottlebrush', then further down lists
>Callistemon `little john' as a DWARF cultivar, with Callistemon citrinus
>as one parent. That may be it, but the only
>thing that bothers me, is that the leaves are describe as being
>blue-green. As best I can recall the plant I saw had dark green leaves.
There are a number of dwarf cultivars based on C citrinus. Like you say,
"Little John" has blue-green leaves, but most others, e.g. "Captain Cook",
have darkish green leaves more like the parent. However all (AFAIK) have
cylindrical rather than spherical flower spikes.
>What have I got and what should I expect?
My best guess (assuming it's Australian) is a Melaleuca rather than a
Callistemon. Or one of the other genuses in this sub-family of the
Myrtaceae. What shape and size were the leaves? How big were the flower balls?
>If these are hybrids
>will I get different phenotypes representing the different
>parents, or what?
It's likely (whether it's a hybrid or not) that the offspring will grow
bigger than the parent; many of these garden cultivars have been specially
selected for dwarfism, and revert if not propagated by cuttings.
John.
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |
Thread Index