Re: Covenants (was bottle trees) (warning--gets ranty by the end)
- Subject: Re: Covenants (was bottle trees) (warning--gets ranty by the end)
- From: E*@aol.com
- Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2002 21:07:28 EST
In a message dated 2/17/02 8:23:32 AM Eastern Standard Time,
karen.tiede@eds.com writes:
<< Take back your front yard! And don't support those nasty covenants by
buying houses in those subdivisions!
It's Sunday. There's my sermon. But y'all are the choir... >>
Good advice.
There were tomato plants on those front lawns when victory gardens were
patriotic. Sometimes the only sunny site you will have is on the front lawn.
I would, heaven forbid, advocate messing up the suburbs but nowhere else in
the world will you find lawn sacred.
You will not find setbacks and line allowances to produce more lawn. These
rules are all over the country originating from early planners (Frederick L.
Olmstead was one). In the last town that I lived there was a fence ordinance
that forbid fences in excess of four feet. There was someone in town court
over that repeatedly.
In my very rural and very small town, the decor surrounding houses is quite
original, many old washers and the like. I would much rather see gardens and
appreciation of the land. Any kind of garden.
While we have many very diverse suppliers now and plenty of resources,
especially online, we are still not a gardening nation. While that is the
case, it is not the mission of non-gardeners to cover the planet with Scott's
everything.
Claire Peplowski
NYS z4
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE PERENNIALS