perennials@hort.net
- Subject: RE: St Bernard's Lily - correct nomenclature?
- From: &* M* <1*@rewrite.hort.net>
- Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 18:43:35 -0500
Title: Re: St Bernard's Lily - correct nomenclature?
Don, I found Anthericum ramosum with the common name Branched St Bernard’s Lily, too. You’re correct that Anthericum liliago is the “true” St B’s Lily. However, when a genus comes up at the RHS site with only 19 entries, of which 4 are syns, 2 are Name not found in literature, 3 are just Tentatively accepted names, and 2 are unchecked names. And then only one has a listed common name, welllll…you can’t blame the others for borrowing the moniker, can you? The differences I can see are that A ramosum is branched, where A liliago is not. A ramosum is listed as taller. And depending on which site you check, I’ve found some say A ramosum might be hardier. Anyway, since I’d never heard of it, I was happy to stumble on any one of them. Kitty From: owner-perennials@hort.net [mailto:owner-perennials@hort.net] On Behalf Of Don Martinson I note that the some sources also refer to Anthericum ramosum as St. Bernard’s-lily or branched St Bernard's-lily, while John Bryan’s reference book “Bulbs” lists St Bernard's-lily as Anthericum liliago. Is there some confusion over the correct name?
|
- References:
- RE: St Bernard's Lily
- From: &* R* &*
- Re: St Bernard's Lily - correct nomenclature?
- From: D* M* &*
- RE: St Bernard's Lily
- Prev by Date: RE: St Bernard's Lily
- Previous by thread: Re: St Bernard's Lily - correct nomenclature?
- Next by thread: RE: St Bernard's Lily