Re: Campanula rapunculoides (creeping bellflower)

Paul,
Your response was the same as I've been saying all along about other plants.
I shouldn't have been that brash about these.  What I meant was that all the
responses up until yours were so very negative, so it seemed prudent to be
cautious and pass it up.  Or if you just can't bring yourself to listen to
warnings (as I at times can't), be vigilent.

Kitty


----- Original Message ----- 
From: <Meum71@aol.com>
To: <perennials@hort.net>
Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 2:12 PM
Subject: Re: Campanula rapunculoides (creeping bellflower)


> In a message dated 6/9/2005 1:39:40 PM Central Standard Time,
> 4042N15@nationalhearing.com writes:
> In any event, they all seem to be a problem for gardeners.  When you see
one
> of them offered, just keep walking.
>
> Kitty
> I have both species and love my C. rapunculoides.  Such large blue flowers
> even in the shade. Great for cutting also.
>
> The Adenophora has smaller flowers and is OK, in shade it doesn't do as
well
> as the C. rapunculoids but my sunny bed is too dry for it.
>
> One should not write off a plant if it spreads, it only means it has to be
> used properly.
>
>
> Paul
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
> message text UNSUBSCRIBE PERENNIALS

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE PERENNIALS
Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index