Flowers

Subject: Flowers
From: "maujean" m*@comcast.net
Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 14:11:05 -0700

Blank Human Affection Altered Evolution of Flowers
By Robert Roy Britt
LiveScience Senior Writer
posted: 26 May 2005
06:53 am ET

Flowers make people happy. And while that might seem obvious, there
hasn't been much research to prove the point until now.

A trio of new studies by Rutgers University scientists supports the
notion pretty strongly, and the experts go on to speculate that flowers have
flourished on this planet, with their beauty evolving in recent millennia,
partly because humans are so attached to them.

The first study involved 147 women. All those who got flowers smiled.
Make a note: all of them. That's the kind of statistical significance
scientists love. Among the women who got candles, 23 percent didn't smile. And
10 percent of those who got fruit didn't smile.

Okay, that's just one study. Let's try another.

In an elevator, 122 men and women were given either a flower, a pen, or
nothing. Those who got flowers smiled more, talked more, and -- here it gets
interesting -- stood closer together.

Finally, in another test, bouquets were delivered by florists to 113 men
and women in a retirement community. All 113 got flowers and a notebook, but
some got them earlier and received a second bouquet when the others got
theirs. By now you can guess the outcome. The more flowers, the more smiles.

From there, it's a bit of a leap to the idea that flowers are prolific
because we love them.

But the results got the scientists to thinking about how the flower
industry of today has evolved into growing things that serve no other purpose
than emotional satisfaction. Nature won't even pollinate many of the
domesticated flowers. Just among roses, there are so many types conjured by
humans that, clearly, flowers aren't what they used to be. But it's likely our
collective hand has played a role longer than you might think.

Rutgers geneticist Terry McGuire suggests that nature's prettier flowers
got to survive and thrive because people didn't destroy them when they cleared
land for agriculture. Instead, they cultivated them and have been doing so for
more than 5,000 years.

"Our hypothesis is that flowers are exploiting an emotional niche. They
make us happy," McGuire says. "Because they are a source of pleasure a
positive emotion inducer we take care of them. In that sense they're like
dogs. They are the pets of the plant world."

Here's one way it might have worked:

Many species of flowers that are now cultivated used to sprout only when
the ground was disturbed, McGuire explains.

"As humans moved into agricultural settings these flowers would have
been weeds," he told LiveScience. "These flowers might have been tolerated
because of their beauty. The seeds would have been preserved -- perhaps
initially because they were mixed with crop seeds -- and replanted. Humans
would have become the seed dispersers. Over time, the best of these flowers
might have been selected and the seeds more carefully preserved."

The idea is detailed in the journal Evolutionary Psychology.