Re: convenants
- Subject: Re: convenants
- From: E*@aol.com
- Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 13:08:37 EDT
In a message dated 10/18/02 9:55:28 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
Cersgarden@aol.com writes:
> I can not believe 'hardship' and 'pool' go hand in hand.
> I think convenants are appropiate. As a homeowner you must be responible
> for
> what you are buying into.
Probably the best way of thinking however "hardship" is usually meant to
plead a case where the situation you may have does not fit into the written
rules. This can happen and is why a zoning board of appeals exists in most
townships and cities, rarely in the country.
Hardship appeals work both ways, it is a legal term. Suppose the builder of
your house places it so that building a garage exceeds the sideline
regulations. You can never have have garage for one or two feet of lack of
forethought. This would be appealed as a hardship. Also neighborhoods
change. Usage changes. In the last fifty years viewpoints on life have
changed drastically.
Not a perennial subject, I realize, but a perennial problem for homeowners.
Common sense should prevail and sometimes does.
Claire Peplowski
NYS z4
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE PERENNIALS