This is a public-interest archive. Personal data is pseudonymized and retained under
GDPR Article 89.
Trouble Indicators
- To: prairie@mallorn.com
- Subject: Trouble Indicators
- From: C* K* <Z*@WPO.CSO.NIU.EDU>
- Date: Sun, 27 Sep 1998 17:44:12 -0500
>>> "Geoff Stanford" <gstanf@swbell.net> 09/27/98 11:58am >>>
Now that is my opinion. What indicators do you recognise?
Geoff
************************************************************************
To Geoff and Everybody Else on this List,
I think this thread on how we measure the success of a prarie
restoration is great! Although I'm still new to prairie botany, I
think I'll agree with Geoff that the presence of native plant species
is a good indicator of success. I'll add my 2 cents worth--that if
you've got native prairie mammals, such as eastern cottontails, least
weasels, least shrews and shorttail shrews, as well as those
all-important meadow voles or prairie voles, you've got the makings
for a self-sustaining small mammal community! (this year my meadow
vole population has been very high!).
My study site in Northern Illinois has a few of the plant species
Geoff listed, but I am troubled by the presence of some non-natives,
especially Hungarian Brome, and White Sweet Clover. Would their
presence indicate a restoration that is in trouble? Or does everybody
have these?
--CK
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@mallorn.com with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE PRAIRIE
Other Mailing lists |
Author Index |
Date Index |
Subject Index |
Thread Index