Re: leafless, buried vines??


Beth,

I think that is something worth trying, I have a narrow growing area and usually
have to eliminate a few vines to prevent over crowding anyway.
I'll give it a try and see what happens.

Bob T.
Torrance, Ca.

rado1000@hotmail.com wrote:

> Here's a snip from Lub-"Marv in Altoona"-adub from late last year...
>
> >Doesn't it seem odd that on the one hand we are talking about burying the
> >vines to stimulate root growth while on the other hand there are >growers
> >taking out every other vine? Maybe we should wonder if taking >the leaves
> >off every other vine and burying that entire vine as it >grows has any
> >merit?
>
> Are we close enough now to the growing season to consider this question
> again??  Has anyone ever tried this?  How about speculation from some of you
> botanist-types out there (Roger???  Rick, are you listening??) and from you
> long-time thinker/grower types (Al? George? Wayne? Brock? Brett? Jon?
> Anybody???)?  Would a vine need a few leaves photosynthesizing to keep the
> nutrient channel active?  Or could a buried vine with no leaves contribute
> to growth as long as there is adequate photosynthesis elsewhere??
>
> Beth
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Pumpkin-growing FAQ: http://www.mallorn.com/lists/pumpkins/search.cgi
> To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@mallorn.com with the
> message text UNSUBSCRIBE PUMPKINS

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Pumpkin-growing FAQ: http://www.mallorn.com/lists/pumpkins/search.cgi
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@mallorn.com with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE PUMPKINS



Other Mailing lists | Author Index | Date Index | Subject Index | Thread Index