Re: 654 Troy genetics
- Subject: Re: 654 Troy genetics
- From: Robert Troy r*@earthlink.net
- Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 12:27:20 -0700
- List-archive: <http://www.hort.net/lists/pumpkins/> (Web Archive)
That's correct. I misunderstood the question. The female was the
940-00 Mombert.
The possible males were: Self.
Bob
Ben Bortner wrote: ya i think he misunderstood. he knows the female but doesnt know the male for sure. I dont know what plant he grew the 654 on. But you dont name the plant after the pumpkin you have growing on it the name of the plant stays the same. i hope that helps im getting a little confused now too.--------------------------------------------------------------------- Pumpkin-growing FAQ: http://www.hort.net/lists/pumpkins/search.cgi To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@hort.net with the message text UNSUBSCRIBE PUMPKINS |
- References:
- Re: 654 Troy genetics
- From: "B* B*"
- From: "B* B*"
- Re: 654 Troy genetics
- Prev by Date: Re: 654 Troy genetics
- Next by Date: RE: Geneva Electric Blows a Fuse
- Previous by thread: Re: 654 Troy genetics
- Next by thread: RE: 654 Troy genetics