Re: Overlooked seeds?
Ethan,
Not familiar with that seed.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ethan Jervis" <ejervis@mindspring.com>
To: <pumpkins@mallorn.com>
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 7:20 PM
Subject: Re: Overlooked seeds?
> How about the Castellucci 682.4?
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Andrew Papez" <apapez@home.com>
> To: <pumpkins@mallorn.com>
> Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 6:57 PM
> Subject: Re: Overlooked seeds?
>
>
> > Chris
> >
> > Another overlooked seed I think that has huge potential is the 678
> > Ciliberto. Saw the results in D. Haegans patch and her pumpkin matured
in
> > mid August and sat there losing weight for a month and a half. Still
> weighed
> > 946 pounds.
> >
> > andrew
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Michalec, Chris" <cmicha@chmc.org>
> > To: <pumpkins@mallorn.com>
> > Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 4:56 PM
> > Subject: RE: Overlooked seeds?
> >
> >
> > > Hi John,
> > > Great topic for this time of year. There are so many seeds out
there
> > that
> > > look as if they have never been tried as you review them in the AGGC.
> > > (Thanks Mike, Al, and all their helpers.) There are probably of
number
> of
> > > seeds with great potential that haven't been given a fair shake. So
> many
> > of
> > > us look to see what has produced for others before we make our
choices.
> A
> > > number of seeds that probably would be great may only show a few
> mid-sized
> > > offspring because they haven't been planted by the heavy hitters and
> given
> > > the best chance to maximize their potential, and were grown by
beginners
> > or
> > > folks who are still trying to get the hang of this. Others never get
> > > planted at all as people wait for someone else to prove that the
> potential
> > > is there. I can think of two that haven't been mentioned that
probably
> > have
> > > good potential.
> > > The 812 LaRue 97 Produced the 758.5 and 815.5 Baird a couple years
> ago,
> > > and either hasn't been planted since or it's offspring haven't made it
> > into
> > > the database or to a weighoff. The other is the 871 Richart 97 that
> Jake
> > > VanKooten in B.C.has done so well with, growing a 764 in 98 and a 942
> with
> > > it last year. Those are the only two offspring from that pumpkin that
> are
> > > noted in the database. Seeing Jake's 942 last year made a believer
out
> of
> > > me and I will be planting the one 871 seed I have this spring.
> > > I think a lot of potential exists in many of these untried and under
> > > utilized seed lines. I just wish I had the time and space to give
more
> of
> > > them a chance. You don't need to spend a lot of money chasing this
> years
> > > darlings to grow your best yet. Most of us have probably already
> acquired
> > > the seeds we need to do that. You just have to give them a chance, it
> may
> > > even come from one from your own patch.
> > >
> > > Chris Michalec
> > > Covington, WA
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: John Failor [SMTP:buckeye5@bright.net]
> > > > Sent: Saturday, January 20, 2001 12:44 AM
> > > > To: pumpkins@mallorn.com
> > > > Subject: Overlooked seeds?
> > > >
> > > > Hello to all,
> > > >
> > > > Recently I was browsing through the AGCC database and I was
struck
> > by
> > > > just how many seeds are there and I wonder how many of them have
> really
> > > > gotten a fair shake. With all those seeds there is way to give them
> all
> > a
> > > > real shot and it is a better bet to plant proven seeds. After
> all,seeds
> > > > are a crape shot as it is but still I have to wonder if there isn't
a
> > > > juggernaut hiding in there somewhere just waiting to be discovered
and
> > > > take off. After all the top seeds are hard to come by and maybe
we
> > will
> > > > find the next top seed.
> > > >
> > > > I would like to get the group's feedback on this subject and
maybe
> > > > some seeds they think are undiscovered monsters.
> > > >
> > > > Here are some that I think might be:
> > > >
> > > > Brock 685
> > > > Wray 738
> > > > Welty 809
> > > > Sproule 952
> > > > McCallum 566
> > > > and first generation 825 Shymanski offspring. (The 801 Stelts can't
be
> > the
> > > > only one with such stellar genetics).
> > > >
> > > > Then again I could be wrong but look at the example of the 903
> > > > Holland. It was grown in 97 and after its first year no one grew a
> huge
> > > > pumpkin with it and people lost interest but this year out of no
> where
> > > > Joel Holland grew a 808, 967 and 1026 with it. I bet it will get
more
> > > > attention this year!
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Any thoughts?
> > > >
> > > > John
> > > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Pumpkin-growing FAQ: http://www.mallorn.com/lists/pumpkins/search.cgi
> > > To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@mallorn.com with the
> > > message text UNSUBSCRIBE PUMPKINS
> > >
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Pumpkin-growing FAQ: http://www.mallorn.com/lists/pumpkins/search.cgi
> > To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@mallorn.com with the
> > message text UNSUBSCRIBE PUMPKINS
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Pumpkin-growing FAQ: http://www.mallorn.com/lists/pumpkins/search.cgi
> To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@mallorn.com with the
> message text UNSUBSCRIBE PUMPKINS
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Pumpkin-growing FAQ: http://www.mallorn.com/lists/pumpkins/search.cgi
To sign-off this list, send email to majordomo@mallorn.com with the
message text UNSUBSCRIBE PUMPKINS
